City of Oakland v. Buteau
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Chapman & Trefethen, Goodfellow, Bells, Moore & Orrick, S. A. Bailey, William B. Bosley and Garret W. McEnerney for Appellants. Paul C. Morf, H. L. Hagan, City Attorneys, and John J. Earle, Assistant City Attorney, for Respondent.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment awarding the possession of real property to the plaintiff.
This action and a prior one entitled City of Oakland v. Wheeler et al., 34 Cal. App. 442, [168 Pac. 23], are companion cases. In each the city of Oakland, as plaintiff, proceeded against the same defendants as trustees of the Merritt Hospital. The suits affect adjacent parts of a tract of land on the waterfront of Oakland. The property involved in the two actions, viewed as a unit, consists of a parcel bounded on the north by First Street, on the east by Washington Street extended southerly, on the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Missouri v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Del Mar Water, Light & Power Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Strand Improvement Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Kopp v. Fair Political Practices CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Nilsen v. Tenneco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- City of Oakland v. ButeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Lechuza Villas West v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.