Hartsfield v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RABINOWITZ, Justice.
This appeal involves the question of whether receipt of a notice of cancellation by the insured is a prerequisite to an effective cancellation of an automobile public liability insurance policy. The trial court held that under the terms of the policy receipt by the insured of notice of cancella tion was not required. We are of the opinion that the trial court’s construction of the policy was correct and hold that under the terms of the cancellation clause in question the mailing of a notice of cancellation to the insured is the only prerequisite to an effective…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
- Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Genone v. Citizens Ins. Co. of New JerseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilson v. PolletAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Hall v. Motorists Insurance CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Hartsfield v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1969
- Stephens v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.