Hartsfield v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOND, Justice.
This case is here for the second time. On the first appeal we held that the mailing by appellee’s agent of a notice of cancellation to the insured, Edgar Hartsfield, was the only prerequisite to an effective cancellation of an automobile liability insurance policy which appellee had issued to Harts-field. 1 But we also held that Hartsfield’s denial that he had ever received a notice of cancellation raised a genuine issue as to a material fact of whether notice of cancellation had been mailed, and therefore that the court below had erred in granting summary judgment for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mitchell Ex Rel. Mitchell v. KnightAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Stephens v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Hartsfield v. Carolina Casualty Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by15 opinions
- Palfy v. RiceAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Poulin v. ZartmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Braham v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Bachner v. RichAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.