Legal Opinion
Joseph Bell, Sophie Karp, Hyman M. Oberman, Lena Smith, the Rainier Company, Inc., a Dissolved Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided December 13, 1968No. 384-65PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PER CURIAM: *
Plaintiffs 1 seek review of a decision by the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, ASBCA No. 3565, in which the appeal of The Rainier Company, Inc. (Rainier) from an adverse decision by the contracting officer was denied. They allege that the Board’s decision was arbitrary, capricious, and unsupported by substantial evidence and contend that they are entitled to either damages or an equitable adjustment in the sum of $115,-900.22 under a contract between Rainier and defendant, acting through the Ordnance Corps, Department of the Army.
The contract, dated March 20,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- River Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Max Drill, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Edward R. Marden Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.