Legal Opinion

Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 13, 1966No. 203-64PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Senior Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff seeks reimbursement for additional costs incurred in trying to perform its contract with defendant under specifications which, prior to amendment, it contends were defective, in that the desired performance could not be attained by following them. After the Contracting Officer had denied its claim, plaintiff took an appeal to the head of the Department, as required by the “Disputes” clause of the contract. The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, acting…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  4. The Austin Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. RM Hollingshead Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  2. Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
  3. J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  4. Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Natus Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API