San Francisco & North Pacific Railroad v. Bee
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant Bee had been in the employ of the San Francisco and Humboldt Bay Eailroad Company, and sued them for his services.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court, Twelfth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The defendant Bee had been in the employ of the San Francisco and Humboldt Bay Eailroad Company, and sued them for his services. The ease went to the Supreme' Court, and is reported in the 46 Cal. p. —. He obtained a final judgment on the 21st of November, 1872, and on the 18th of September, 1873, obtained an execution on his judgment, which was placed in the hands of the defendant Latapie, who was Sheriff, and he advertised the ten miles of railroad,mentioned in the opinion, for sale. This action was…
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:
The property levied upon to satisfy the judgment of Bee against The San Francisco and Humboldt Bay Eailroad Company is admitted to have been formly the property of that company. The judgment of Bee was rendered in November, 1872 (upon an indebtedness existing as early as July, 1869), and the execution thereon, issued in September, 1873, was levied upon property claimed by the corporation plaintiff in this suit, The San Francisco and North Pacific Eailroad Company, and described in the complaint as follows: “ The road-bed for a distance of ten miles north,…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Grenell v. Detroit Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Kohl v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Atkinson v. Western Development SyndicateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Olney v. Conanicut Land Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.