Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Santana
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 2, 1997, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
After arguing with a co-worker over the volume on a radio, claimant threatened the co-worker with an object wrapped in a towel which appeared to be a knife. Claimant was thereafter discharged and his application for unemployment insurance benefits was denied. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claim*565ant lost…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- In re the Claim of QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of OkumakpeyiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re the Claim of MearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re the Claim of MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Matter of Lamo (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022