Legal Opinion
Hulse v. A.B. Dick Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1994PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Stephen G. Crane, J.
The question before the court in this repetitive stress injury (RSI) action is whether plaintiffs are entitled to a protective order against nonsettling defendants who seek to discover the terms of confidential settlement agreements entered into between plaintiffs and codefendants. Indeed, it is no secret that plaintiffs Audrey Hulse and Lewis R. Hulse (Hulse) have settled their claims against both A.B. Dick Company (A.B. Dick) and Sony Corporation of America (SONY). An express condition of both settlements, however, was that each party would keep…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hallock v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Denburg v. Flattau & KlimplNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rock v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Porter Hayden Co. v. BullingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Hasbrouck v. BankAmerica Housing ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999
- Osowski v. AMEC Construction Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- New York County Data Entry Worker Product Liability Litigation v. A.B. Dick Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Masterwear Corp. v. BernardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.