Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical Bank
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
In an action to recover fees for consulting services, Spectrum Systems International Corporation demanded that defendant, Chemical Bank, produce certain documents pertaining to the bank’s internal investigation of possible fraud by employees and vendors, including Spectrum. Chemical responded by seeking a protective order, asserting that the documents were protected from disclosure by the attorney-client privilege, by the attorney work product doctrine, and as material *375prepared in anticipation of litigation. This appeal requires us to consider whether a report…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Koump v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rossi v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by257 opinions
- Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & LandisNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Toledo-Lucas County Port AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Ambac Assurance Corporation v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2016
- Forman v. HenkinCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- Gillard v. AIG InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.