Wilson v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
This is a case about attorney fees, specifically, about plaintiffs entitlement to attorney fees after prevailing on an uninsured motorist claim against defendant Tri-Met and, even more specifically, about the extent to which defendant’s offer to settle the case affects plaintiffs entitlement to such an attorney fee award. The answer requires an examination of the interplay between ORS 742.061, a statute that applies to recovery of attorney fees in an action on an insurance policy, and ORCP 54 E, a rule that limits recovery of attorney fees after a party presents an offer of judgment to an…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Stephens v. BohlmanOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Chalmers v. OREGON AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
- Dockins v. State Farm InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Center, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Ctr., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- City of Portland v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Jones v. NavaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Providence Health Plan v. WinchesterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.