Legal Opinion

Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Ctr., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 31, 2019No. A161404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAoyagi, J.

*649After the termination of his employment, plaintiff brought a wage action against defendant employer, which was referred to the trial court's mandatory court-annexed arbitration program. The arbitrator awarded plaintiff $3.40 in unpaid wages and $1,383.96 in penalty wages. The arbitrator also awarded plaintiff $6,310 in attorney fees under ORS 652.200(2), which generally entitles a successful plaintiff on a wage claim to "a reasonable sum for attorney fees." Plaintiff had requested a substantially greater fee award, but the arbitrator denied that request, largely due to the application of ORCP…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Oregon State Motor Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Colby v. LarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hekker v. Sabre Construction CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Fresk v. KraemerOregon Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trent v. Connor Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  2. Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Center, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Fisk v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  4. Mathis v. St. Helens Auto Ctr., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API