Legal Opinion

Monroe-Goldkamp Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 25, 1926No. 2640PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Paragraph 1458 of the Tariff Act of 1922 provides for a duty of 25 per centum ad valorem upon "White bleached beeswax.”

Paragraph 1693 of the act gives free entry to—

Wax: Animal, vegetable, or mineral, not specially provided for.

A question presented by this appeal is whether the imported merchandise is dutiable under the first-mentioned paragraph, as classified by the collector, and held by the board, or is entitled to free entry under the second' paragraph, as claimed by the importer. The real issue, however, is whether the board’s finding is supported by the evidence and that, in turn,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Felton v. SpiroCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  2. Newcomb v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Pugh v. Bluff City Excursion Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Bache v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  5. Draeger Shipping Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. VictorUnited States Customs Court · 1948
  2. Rietmann-Pilcer Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. United States v. F. W. Myers & Co.United States Customs Court · 1950
  4. Florea & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. F. W. Myers & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API