Baker v. Mauldin
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Judge.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant. We hold that under the circumstances of this case summary judgment was improvidently granted.
Plaintiff positively alleged in her complaint that defendant was mentally and physically impaired by the consumption of beer in violation of G.S. 20-138.1. Defendant admitted the truth of this allegation in his answer. Defendant is bound by his pleadings. Universal C.I.T. Credit Corp. v. Saunders, 235 N.C. 369, 70 S.E. 2d 176 (1952). Hence, plaintiffs allegation is conclusive. It is…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Davis Ex Rel. Allen v. RigsbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- King v. AllredSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Ballinger v. Secretary of the Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Yancey v. LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- Yancey v. LeaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- The NC State Bar v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Robinson v. TranthamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Carmely v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.