Meyer v. Roettele
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.
This is a claim made by the parents of Maurice Meyer against Elmer Roettele, employer, and the Western Surety Company, insurer, under the provisions of the Workmen’s ■Compensation Act (Rev. Code 1919, § 9398 et seq.) for compensation for the death of their son. The matter came on for hearing before the industrial commissioner on November 25, 1932, acting in lieu of the board1 of arbitration. The commissioner denied compensation, ¡holding in effect that death was not caused by accidental injury arising out of and in the course of employment. Plaintiffs petitioned for a review, and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Van Vechten v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Connelly v. Hunt Furniture Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Piper v. Neighborhood Youth Corps.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Oviatt v. Oviatt Dairy, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Matter of MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1944
- King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.