Motor Contract Co. v. Van Der Volgen
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
Alleging the defendant refused to pay two overdue installments on an automobile, and that the plaintiff elected to declare all amounts paid thereon forfeited, the plaintiff finance company commenced this action to obtain possession of the automobile, and to recover the costs of the action and the sum of one hundred dollars as a reasonable attorney’s fee. It appears from the allegations of the complaint that the plaintiff, a finance company doing business in the state of Washington, purchased, for value, from the vendor the conditional sales contract on which the Guaranteed Used Car Company…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lundberg v. SwitzerWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Nelson Company v. GoodrichWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- St. Andrews Parish v. GallagherAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1923
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Quality Finance Co. v. HurleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
- McDonald v. WocknerWashington Supreme Court · 1954
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.