Weitzman v. Bergstrom

(dissenting)—There is no need to reiterate the facts which are set forth in the majority opinion. As a result of the complaints of the defendant and defaults in payment, an agent of the plaintiff returned to Seattle in February of 1963 and spent 4 weeks trying to improve defendant’s situation. The difficulties continued.'

Defendant, being pressed for payments, sought the advice of counsel and retained an attorney to represent him in further negotiations with plaintiff. On April 13, 1963, plaintiff’s agent and defendant entered into a compromise agreement.3 This compromise agreement was…