Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & Fine
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtPoff, J.
We consider whether, when an attorney employed under a contingent fee contract is discharged without just cause and the client employs another attorney who effects a settlement, the discharged attorney is entitled to the contractual fee or to a fee based upon quantum meruit for services rendered prior to discharge. The fee in issue was awarded to Fine, Fine, Legum & Fine, Attorneys at Law (hereinafter, Legum), in orders approving settlement of a claim for damages for personal injuries growing out of an automobile accident. These orders were entered in a suit filed by attorney Augustus Anninos…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- County of Campbell v. HowardSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Krippner v. MatzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Dolph v. SpeckartOregon Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Cohen v. Radio-Electronics Officers Union District 3Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Succession of WallaceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
- Covington v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Hughes v. ColeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.