Legal Opinion

Dolph v. Speckart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1919PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Multnomah.: Robert Tucker, Judge. In Bane. On motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMcBRIDE, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal, on the ground that the notice of appeal does not describe with sufficient certainty the judgment appealed from.

The notice of appeal is in the usual form and states that the defendant appeals from a judgment against her rendered on June 28, 1916, for the sum of $128; the further sum of $2,509.14, and the sum of-dollars costs. The transcript discloses a judgment for the sum of $128.50, the further sum of $2,509.14, and $57.05 costs, entered on July 1, 1916, and dated June 29, 1916. The notice of appeal was served August 27, 1918, and an undertaking on…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. Tonn v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Sohn v. BrockingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  4. Walters Ex Rel. Walters v. HastingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Rayburn Et Ux. v. Crawford Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API