Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1979No. 51678PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

This appeal involves an action to recover attorney’s fees allegedly due under a contingent-fee contract entered into between Chapman and Chapman, a law firm in Granite City, and William D. Rhoades, an employee of the Norfolk and Western Railway Company. The Norfolk and Western was named a party defendant because it paid a personal injury settlement to Rhoades against which the Chapman firm asserted an attorney’s lien under section 1 of “An Act creating attorney’s lien and for enforcement of same” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 13, par. 14).

On January 11, 1976, Rhoades sustained a knee injury…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Covington v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. EasleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Walter P. Maksym, Jr. v. Dolores LoeschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Balla v. Gambro, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API