Rhoades v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski
This appeal involves an action to recover attorney’s fees allegedly due under a contingent-fee contract entered into between Chapman and Chapman, a law firm in Granite City, and William D. Rhoades, an employee of the Norfolk and Western Railway Company. The Norfolk and Western was named a party defendant because it paid a personal injury settlement to Rhoades against which the Chapman firm asserted an attorney’s lien under section 1 of “An Act creating attorney’s lien and for enforcement of same” (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 13, par. 14).
On January 11, 1976, Rhoades sustained a knee injury…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Baker v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Covington v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by112 opinions
- Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. GleasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. EasleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Walter P. Maksym, Jr. v. Dolores LoeschCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re Estate of CallahanIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Balla v. Gambro, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.