County of Campbell v. Howard
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Sims, J.,
after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:
The questions presented by the assignments of error will be disposed of in their order as stated below.
1. Were instructions 1, 1-a and 1-b erroneous, in that they set up a wrong standard by which the jury were directed to measure the amount of recovery — • namely, the value of the benefit derived by the county from the services in question (i. e., the value of the services on a quantum valebat); instead of the value in itself of the work done (i, e., the value of the services on a quantum meruit)?
*49The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- People Ex Rel. Johnson v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Bradley v. School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
- Hendrickson v. MeredithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Hays v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Southern Biscuit Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.