Legal Opinion

County of Campbell v. Howard

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 15, 1922PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sims, J.,

after making the foregoing statement, delivered the following opinion of the court:

The questions presented by the assignments of error will be disposed of in their order as stated below.

1. Were instructions 1, 1-a and 1-b erroneous, in that they set up a wrong standard by which the jury were directed to measure the amount of recovery — • namely, the value of the benefit derived by the county from the services in question (i. e., the value of the services on a quantum valebat); instead of the value in itself of the work done (i, e., the value of the services on a quantum meruit)?

*49The…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. People Ex Rel. Johnson v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Selover v. BryantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Heinzman v. Fine, Fine, Legum & FineSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  2. Bradley v. School BoardDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1971
  3. Hendrickson v. MeredithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. Hays v. City of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Southern Biscuit Co. v. LloydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API