Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Ribicoff

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided June 19, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 1098PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action under 42 U.S. C.A. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. That decision disallowed plaintiff’s claim for a period of disability under 42 U.S. C.A. § 416(i) and for disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C.A. § 423, and the jurisdiction of this court is limited to a determination of whether that decision was based on substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g). The court is precluded from having a hearing de novo. See Carpenter v. Flemming, D.C. N.D.W.Va., 178…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carl G. Underwood, (Social Security Account Number Tqv-Im-Bnsb v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1962
  2. Carpenter v. FlemmingDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1959
  3. Pruitt v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1960
  4. Bowden v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Leonard H. Garrett v. Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  2. Clemochefsky v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Mims v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1963
  4. Graham v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1964
  5. Pace v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API