Legal Opinion

Bowden v. Ribicoff

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided December 11, 1961No. 1057PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARRY E. WATKINS, District Judge.

This is an action under the Social Security Act as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. Plaintiff seeks to establish a period of disability under 42 U.S.C.A. § 416(i), and a right to disability insurance benefits under 42 U.S.C.A. § 423.

Under 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(g), the jurisdiction of this court is limited to a determination of whether the findings of the Secretary are based on “substantial evidence.” The court is precluded from having a hearing de novo. These matters have been previously…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. FlemmingDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1959
  2. Pruitt v. FlemmingDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blankenship v. RibicoffDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1962
  2. Spickard v. RibicoffDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1962
  3. Baisden v. CelebrezzeDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API