Legal Opinion
Barnica v. Kenai Peninsula Borough School District
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided May 3, 2002No. S-9155PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
On August 22, 1995, Lavern Barnica resigned from his position as a custodian at the Nikiski High School. Eight months later he sued the Kenai Peninsula Borough School District and his former immediate supervisor, Gladys Stalker,1 for wrongfully constructively discharging him from employment. Barnica claimed that he was discriminated against because of his sex in violation of AS 18.80.220, and that this discriminatory treatment "made working conditions so intolerable that Plaintiff was foreed into involuntary resignation." Barnica alleged that Stalker permitted women…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Barnica v. Kenai Peninsula Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Hendricks-Pearce v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.