Legal Opinion
Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2005No. S-10448PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Robert Hammond was terminated from his job with the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. He contested his termination by pursuing the grievance-arbitration mandated by his collective bargaining agreement. While his grievance was being contested, Hammond simultaneously pursued statutory whistleblower claims in state court against the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities and fellow employees David Eberle, Richard Briggs, and Gordon Keith. His grievance was ultimately dismissed after arbitration. The superior court then gave…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jacquelyn M. Quint v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company, Jacquelyn M. Quint v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Kalenka v. Jadon, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Crawford v. KempAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- DeNardo v. CorneloupAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.