Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2005No. S-10448Published

1DissentMatthews, Justice

I disagree with today’s opinion insofar as it holds that Hammond may litigate twice the question whether the accusations that he made against his employer were in good faith, that is, with a reasonable basis for believing them to be true.

One of the grounds the state relied on for firing Hammond was that he made unfounded attacks on the integrity and competence of DOTPF staff that undermined the department’s ability to carry out its mission. To succeed in his challenge to his firing, Hammond had to establish that he acted in good faith with a reasonable belief that his accusations were true.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. University of Alaska v. Modern Construction, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Department of Public Safety v. Public Safety Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API