Legal Opinion
Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 25, 2005No. S-10448Published
1Opinion of the Court
107 P.3d 871 (2005)
Robert R. HAMMOND, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Alaska, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION & PUBLIC FACILITIES, Appellees.
No. S-10448.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
February 25, 2005.
Robert R. Hammond, pro se, Chugiak.
Marjorie L. Vandor, Assistant Attorney General, and Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, Juneau, for Appellees.
Before: FABE, Chief Justice, MATTHEWS, EASTAUGH, BRYNER, and CARPENETI, Justices.
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Robert Hammond was terminated from his job with the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. He contested his termination by pursuing the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Jacquelyn M. Quint v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company, Jacquelyn M. Quint v. A.E. Staley Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.