Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Marsick

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1998No. 1997-2257PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 81 Ohio St.3d 551.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. MARSICK. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Marsick,

1998-Ohio-337.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Six-month suspension—Abuse of pretrial discovery process—Suppressing evidence when responding to interrogatories during discovery. (No. 97-2257—Submitted January 21, 1998—Decided April 29, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-108. __________________ {¶ 1} On December 9, 1996, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. James M. Abrahamsen James M. Abrahamsen, of the Estate of Gloria Jean Abrahamsen, Deceased v. Trans-State Express, Inc. Ronald E. ReaganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. TrumboOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GreeneOhio Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. WrennOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. MarsickOhio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API