Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wallace

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1998No. 1998-0780PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 496.] CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. WALLACE. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wallace,

1998-Ohio-1.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Public reprimand—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law. (No. 98-780—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided November 4, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 96-69. __________________ {¶ 1} In a single-count complaint filed on August 12, 1996, relator, Cincinnati Bar Association, charged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bronston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. WoodOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. MarsickOhio Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. StaffordOhio Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API