Legal Opinion
United States v. Pham
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 23, 2008No. 06-30489PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GOULD; Concurrence by Judge FISHER.
GOULD, Circuit Judge:
This case illustrates the dangers of an identity theft scheme whereby many persons and financial institutions are impacted when criminals steal identities. Lam Thanh Pham (“Pham”) appeals the 78-month sentence and $1 million restitution order imposed on him after he pled guilty to one count of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344.1 Pham and five other individuals were indicted on forty-four counts of bank fraud in connection with a massive identity theft scheme that compromised the bank accounts of ninety-five…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Rodney Robert Kimbrew, A.K.A. Carlton CochranCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Latorey EarvinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.