Legal Opinion
United States v. Latorey Earvin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 19, 2012No. 10-3587, 10-3588, 10-3589PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANE B. STRANCH, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Cedrick Stubblefield, Brandon Spigner, and Latorey Earvin were part of a conspiracy that created false driver’s licenses using the genuine identity information of others in order to cash counterfeit checks at Wal-Mart stores. All three pled guilty to two counts: conspiracy to utter counterfeited securities, to knowingly possess five or more false identification documents with intent to use them unlawfully, and to commit aggravated identity theft (Count 1), see 18 U.S.C. § 371; and aggravated identity theft (Count 3), see 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Paul VolkmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Jennifer RiccardiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Christopher YancyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Patrick WintersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Telly ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.