Legal Opinion

United States v. Armstead

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 30, 2008No. 06-30550PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Opinion filed October 15, 2008, and reported at 546 F.3d 1097, is withdrawn and replaced by the Amended Opinion filed concurrently with this order. With the filing of the Amended Opinion, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing. Judges Reinhardt and McKeown vote to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Tashima so recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge of the court has requested a vote on en banc rehearing. See Fed. R.App. P. 35(f).

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. United States v. TreadwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. Collins ChristensenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. John NaniaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API