Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. DeVille Engineering Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1968No. Civ. 32265PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, J. pro tem. *

This action was commenced as one to foreclose a chattel mortgage on a Caterpillar Tractor which defendants had hypothecated to plaintiffs as security for the payment of all rentals and other obligations under a Machinery Lease Agreement covering three units of earth-moving equipment. However, by the time the litigation reached the trial stage, the action, without any amended or supplemental pleadings being filed in the interim, became one to collect a balance allegedly due as unpaid rental and for liquidated damage as provided in a formula set out in the agreement.

Plainti…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coleman Engineering Co. v. North American Aviation, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Garber v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Lewetzow v. SapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Wilson v. MoriartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Ball v. American Trial Lawyers Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. McAdams v. McElroyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API