Legal Opinion

Lewetzow v. Sapiro

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1961No. Civ. 19089PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Appellant, the defendant in an automobile collision action, urges on appeal: (1) the court’s “failure to find on all material issues ’ ’ constituted reversible error; (2) the court’s findings “are contrary to the positive declarations and admissions” of respondent; (3) respondent “failed to overcome the prima facie evidence of how the accident happened”; (4) respondent showed “no causal relationship” between the accident and her injuries; and (5) the trial court erred in not granting appellant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of surprise. We have concluded that appellant’s allegations…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Bonebrake v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Le Strange v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Calloway v. DownieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API