Lewetzow v. Sapiro
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
Appellant, the defendant in an automobile collision action, urges on appeal: (1) the court’s “failure to find on all material issues ’ ’ constituted reversible error; (2) the court’s findings “are contrary to the positive declarations and admissions” of respondent; (3) respondent “failed to overcome the prima facie evidence of how the accident happened”; (4) respondent showed “no causal relationship” between the accident and her injuries; and (5) the trial court erred in not granting appellant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of surprise. We have concluded that appellant’s allegations…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bonebrake v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Le Strange v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Calloway v. DownieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.