Legal Opinion

Vorpagel v. Maxell Corp. of America

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 21, 2002No. 2-01-0729PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

Plaintiff, William Vorpagel, appeals the order of the circuit court dismissing his complaint in which he alleged that defendant, Maxell Corporation of America, discharged him in retaliation for his cooperating in the criminal investigation of a co-employee. Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint because it states a claim for retaliatory discharge even though the co-employee’s crime had no connection with plaintiffs work. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiffs first amended complaint, which is at issue here, alleges the following. Defendant employed plaintiff as a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kolegas v. Heftel Broadcasting Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Ziemba v. MierzwaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Turner v. Memorial Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Webber v. Wight & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  3. MacKie v. Vaughan Chapter-Paralyzed Veterans of America, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. King v. Senior Services Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. Smith v. The Waukegan Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API