Legal Opinion
King v. Senior Services Associates, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided June 30, 2003No. 2-02-0422PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McLAREN
Plaintiff, Marty W. King, appeals from the order of the trial court granting the motion to dismiss of defendants, Senior Services Associates (SSA) and Bette Schoenholtz. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.
In October 2001, King filed a two-count complaint alleging retahatory discharge against SSA (count I) and Schoenholtz (count II). Both defendants filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 2000)), which the trial court granted. This appeal followed.
King contends that the trial court erred in granting defendants’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Buckner v. Atlantic Plant Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
- Fisher v. Lexington Health Care, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- T & S SIGNS, INC. v. Village of WadsworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Fiumetto v. Garrett Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Carty v. Suter Co., Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Chicago Commons Ass'n v. HancockAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Tilschner v. SpanglerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- State Farm v. Du Page CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. v. Du Page CountyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.