Legal Opinion

Smith v. The Waukegan Park District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 6, 2007No. 2-05-0628 RelPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Zenoff

Plaintiff, Gregory A. Smith, sued defendant, the Waukegan Park District, for retaliatory discharge. The trial court dismissed the complaint (see 735 ILCS 5/2 — 619(a)(9) (West 2002)), holding that defendant was immune under the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (Act) (745 ILCS 10/1 — 101 et seq. (West 2002)). Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Plaintiffs complaint alleged as follows. Plaintiff, a seasonal park maintenance worker, was injured on the job and filed a claim for workers’ compensation benefits (see 820 ILCS 305/1 et seq. (West 2002)). When plaintiff was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Harinek v. 161 North Clark Street Ltd. PartnershipIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Buckner v. Atlantic Plant Maintenance, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Midgett v. Sackett-Chicago, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Waukegan Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Smith v. Waukegan Park Dist.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ross v. May Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Lujano v. Town of CiceroDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Smith v. Waukegan Park Dist.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API