Legal Opinion
Smith v. Flax
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 9, 1980No. 78-1201PublishedCited by 245 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge:
The plaintiff sought damages for alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. His basic claims were submitted to a jury, which returned a verdict in his favor. Thereafter, however, the district judge granted the defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, alternatively, for a new trial. The plaintiff appealed, and we affirm.
Prior to 1971 Smith had been employed by the Rand Corporation as an analyst. He had been working on problems of logistics, but became concerned about his continued employment by Rand when its work on logistical…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Frank L. LOEB, Plaintiff, v. TEXTRON, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. SweeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
3Cited by245 opinions
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Holifield v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Hawkins v. PepsiCo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Charles DALE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
240 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.