Legal Opinion
Stone v. Autoliv ASP, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 11, 2000No. 98-4074PublishedCited by 275 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
This case arises from a reduction in force (“RIF”) instituted in 1995 by defendant Autoliv ASP, Inc., a manufacturer of airbags. As a result of the RIF, James M. Stone was terminated after eighteen years of working for Autoliv. Stone sued Autoliv for discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634. The district court granted Autoliv summary judgment, from which Stone appeals.
Our determination on review turns on (1) whether Stone has established a prima facie case of age discrimination by demonstrating that…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by275 opinions
- Haynes v. Level 3 Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Plotke v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Hinds v. Sprint/United Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Adamson v. Multi Community Diversified Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- James Hunt v. City of Markham, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
270 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.