Legal Opinion

District Bond Co. v. Cannon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 4, 1937No. Civ. 11322PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Petitioner seeks by writ of mandate to compel defendant, the treasurer of the city of Montebello, a city of the sixth class, to pay to it the entire balance in her custody of the interest and sinking fund of a district organized under the provisions of the Acquisition and Improvement Act of 1925, notwithstanding the insufficiency of the fund to pay all of the matured bonds. The appeal is by the defendant from a judgment in petitioner’s favor.

It is alleged in the petition, which was filed March 7, 1935, that petitioner is the owner of ten series A Acquisition and Improvement District No. 6…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ruggles v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. California Trust Co. v. HubbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. In re the Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Harnish v. BramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Rohwer v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of FerrallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Hamilton v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Mitchell v. County Sanitation District Number OneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API