State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} The primary question before us today is whether an action in mandamus by appellee General Motors Corporation (“GMC”) was the proper vehicle by which to seek relief from the order of appellant Industrial Commission that under R.C. 4123.56, GMC could not claim an offset for taxes withheld on appellant Chester Stephan’s behalf. For the reasons that follow, we hold that mandamus was the proper course of action for this case.
Relevant Background
{¶ 2} On October 5, 1998, Stephan, a GMC employee, suffered a herniated disc in the performance of his duties. Following the injury, Stephan filed a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State ex rel. Leslie v. Ohio Housing Finance AgencyOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State ex rel. Gassmann v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- State ex rel. Huntington Insurance Agency, Inc. v. DuryeeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- State ex rel. Belle Tire Distribs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Aaron's, Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. City of Lorain v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Cassens Corp. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2024
- The STATE EX REL. GADELL-NEWTON v. HUSTED Et Al.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.