The STATE EX REL. GADELL-NEWTON v. HUSTED Et Al.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
*225 {¶ 1} In this expedited election case, relator, Constance Gadell-Newton, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel respondents, Ohio Secretary of State Jon Husted, the Franklin County Board of Elections, and the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections, to preserve digital ballot images created by voting equipment used in the May 8, 2018 primary election. We dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction.
I. Background
{¶ 2} Franklin County employs two voting systems. It uses optical-scan paper ballots for six categories of voters: those using absentee ballots to vote by mail, provisional voters, qualified…
Also in this document: Dissent · O'Donnell; Dissent · O'Donnell.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State ex rel. Waters v. SpaethOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Grendell v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. SuperAmerica Group v. Licking County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Governor v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State ex rel. Harris v. Rubino (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Ohio Stands Up!, Inc. v. DeWine (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. Duncan v. Am. Transm. Sys., Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- State ex rel. Maras v. LaRoseOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- State ex rel. King v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.