Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Belle Tire Distribs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 2018No. 2016-1839PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

*105*488{¶ 1} Appellant, Belle Tire Distributors, Inc., filed a complaint for a writ of mandamus in the Tenth District Court of Appeals challenging appellee Industrial Commission's determination that it had continuing jurisdiction to reconsider a previous order denying a claim for death benefits because of a clear mistake of fact regarding how the decedent worker died.

{¶ 2} The court of appeals granted a motion to dismiss filed by appellee Judy Melroy on the basis that Belle Tire had a plain and adequate remedy at law-the right to appeal to a court of common pleas pursuant to R.C. 4123.512.

*489{¶ 3}…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Nicholls v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State ex rel. Liposchak v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Neitzelt v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Hersh v. GrumerOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. Godwin v. Facebook, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Shaut v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  5. State ex rel. Prinkey v. Emerine's Towing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API