Legal Opinion

State v. Sandsness

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2003No. S-9910PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Darrel Whitaker shot and killed Richard Sandsness seven weeks after the State of Alaska released Whitaker, a seventeen-year-old juvenile offender, from eustody. Sandsness's widow and daughter sued the state for negligence, alleging that it knew Whitaker had dangerous propensities. Denying summary judgment to the state, the superior court held that the state, in deciding whether to ask a court to extend Whitaker's state commitment, owed an actionable duty to exercise due care. We reverse. Imposing this duty would conflict with the state's goal of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Thompson v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Peter W. v. San Francisco Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  3. Grimm v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. D. S. W. ex rel. R. M. W. v. Fairbanks North Star Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Division of Corrections, Department of Health & Social Services v. NeakokAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. State, Department of Corrections v. CowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Hurn Ex Rel. D.H. v. GreenwayAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  4. C.J. v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. City of Hooper Bay v. BunyanAlaska Supreme Court · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API