Legal Opinion

Kallstrom v. United States

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 2002No. S-9332PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We accepted certification in this case to decide whether a Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED) cause of action exists under Alaska law for a plaintiff who becomes a participant in the infliction of another's injuries through the negligence of the defendant. Because we think that such an extension is inadvisable, we hold that an NIED claim is not available to such an "unwitting instrument."

II. FACTS 1 AND PROCEEDINGS

On November 27, 1998, Blanche Kalistrom and other members of the public attended a social function and dance at Jake's Place,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Leong Ex Rel. Petagno v. TakasakiHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Elden v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Dunphy v. GregorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sowinski v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. TeelAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. SandsnessAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Larsen v. Banner Health SystemWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Parnell v. Peak Oilfield Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2008

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API