Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. Buttonlath Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 1920No. 3795PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by John Schumacher and Joseph E. Schumacher against the Buttonlath Manufacturing Company to restrain infringement of certain patents issued to and owned by plaintiffs, namely: No. 1,176,322, dated March 21, 1916, containing nine claims, for improved processes of making plaster board and the like (wallboard), for use in building construction; No. 1,176,-860, dated March 28, 1916, containing four claims, for improved processes of making plaster board, such as is used in the building arts (wallboard) both for internal and external walls; No. 1,197,553,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Smith v. Goodyear Dental Vulcanite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Research Products Co. v. Tretolite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Reinharts, Inc. v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Dunkley Co. v. Central California CanneriesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.