Legal Opinion

Arens v. COMMITTEE ON PRO. CONDUCT OF SUPREME COURT

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 25, 1991No. 91-80PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The Committee on Professional Conduct issued letters of caution as a sanction against John Arens and Richard Alexander, law partners, for charging a fee that was not “reasonably commensurate with the circumstances” and, after termination of their employment, failing to “take steps to the extent reasonably practicable to protect the client’s interests.” They jointly appeal the entry of their separate sanctions on the committee’s records. We affirm the committee’s actions.

Leon and Marcie Stoppel were the operators of a farming business, involving about 7,000 acres,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Muhammed v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James A. Neal v. Jimmie L. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  2. In Re GastineauOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Travis v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Finch v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Neal v. WilsonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API