Legal Opinion
Finch v. Neal
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 11, 1994No. 93-1190PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
The Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct (Committee) issued a reprimand to appellant, attorney Roy Finch, for a violation of Rule 8.4(d), Model Rules of Professional Conduct, which provides “it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to . . . engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice” and that he did so while acting as advocate for Don Jones. Mr. Finch appeals. We affirm the Committee’s actions.
Ms. Diana McIntyre Kimbrell (McIntyre) filed a formal complaint with the Committee alleging that Roy Finch, as attorney…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hawthorne v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Muhammed v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Reed v. Alcoholic Beverage Control DivisionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
- Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Ward v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Coleman's Service Center, Inc. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996
- Judicial Discipline & Disability Commission v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Fink v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Cortinez v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Mays v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.