Legal Opinion
Muhammed v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 12, 1987No. 86-145PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This appeal is from a determination by the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct that the appellant’s attorney’s license be suspended for one year. The appellant contends that the evidence before the committee was insufficient to support the suspension, that the committee’s action was contrary to the law and the facts, and that the committee lacked authority to suspend his license.
The committee found the appellant had violated DR 1-102(A)4 which was in effect at the time of the appellant’s alleged misconduct and which provided that a lawyer shall not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. BreedingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Henry H. Cross Co. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Weems v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- HOCKWORTH v. First Nat. Bank of CrossettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Hurst v. Bar Rules Committee of the State of Ark.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. GuentherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Ridling v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Lewellen v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Sexton v. Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Sexton v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional ConductSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.