Kern v. Saul
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
The foundation of this action is a promissory note, executed by the appellee to the appellant. The appellee answered in four paragraphs:
1. General denial.
2. Payment.
3. Failure of consideration.
The fourth is substantially the same as the third.
To the second paragraph the appellant replied, and demurred to the third and fourth paragraphs. The demurrer was overruled to each paragraph. The appellant elected to stand on such rulings and declined to plead further. Final judgment was thereupon rendered *73against appellant that he should take nothing by his complaint, and that appellee recover his…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clearwater v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Walter A. Wood Mowing & Reaping Machine Co. v. IronsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Norris v. TiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
- City of Jeffersonville v. TomlinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gregory v. ArmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Greensburg Water Co. v. LewisIndiana Supreme Court · 1920
- Lingeman v. ShirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Quail v. BantaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Roemler v. DiceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.