Legal Opinion

City of Jeffersonville v. Tomlin

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1893No. 735PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The errors assigned are:

1. That the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

2. That the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the first paragraph of complaint.

3. That the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the second paragraph of complaint.

4. That the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

5. That the court erred in overruling the motion fora venire de novo.

6. That the court erred in overruling the appellant’s motion for judgment on the special verdict of the jury.

The record does not disclose that any judgment was ever rendered…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Neyens v. FlesherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  2. Kurtz v. PhillipsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Kern v. SaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Wayne Sewer & Drain Co. v. Ward Cowen Constraction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. State ex rel. Whistler v. HerodIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API